#FRBDraft2012 7 for 7: Jacob Trouba

Jacob Trouba, Defenseman (Right)
United States National Team Development Program
2/26/1994 6'2" 191 Pounds

Scouting Report:
Impressive package of aggression and control...willing physical participant, which makes him hard to play against in his own end...fluid and powerful skater, plays with an unreal amount of poise...routinely makes correct decisions with the puck on his stick...makes an excellent first pass, and has the vision to connect on passes of all lengths...more of a first-pass player out of his own end, but has the ability to rush the puck up the ice...can be overzealous at times with his physical play, but will drop the gloves...very competitive player...possesses a heavy and accurate shot, making him a very effective triggerman...very tough player to beat along the boards...holds the blueline effectively and forces opponents to chip the puck in deep...very sturdy skater, making him not only hard to knock off the puck, but also gives him an advantage in winning leverage battles...shows very good ability to maintain gap control...offensive upside is questionable, as he doesn't possess high end creativity.

Isolation Video of Trouba, courtesy of Reel Hockey Scouting

Why Trouba at 7?:

Dan: I'll freely admit I'm a fan of Jacob Trouba, but inherent bias aside, he has the same qualities that Minnesota has looked for in the defensemen they have taken- guys who can move the puck, defend well, and play a competitive game. Trouba can do all of that, and add a physical element that Jonas Brodin doesn't currently possess. I did an interview with Derek Zona of The Copper and Blue in which we talked about Trouba, and one of the things we talked about was a stylistic comparison. I see alot of Brent Seabrook in Trouba, as in he can be a #1 guy in weak to mediocre teams, but ideally he's a really high end #2 D. However, even if he doesn't reach that, I believe he can still be a really tough match up guy, similar to Nick Schultz- a guy you can count on to play "tough" minutes against other teams' top players. Trouba's no stranger to international competitions- he opened eyes at this year's World Junior Championships as a 17 year old playing in a predominantly 19 to 20 year old tournament, and was one of the key cogs in the US winning the Gold Medal at the U-18 Championships this Spring, although he played more of a support role to Seth Jones, who you will hear about ad nauseum as soon as this year's edition of the Entry Draft is over. Maybe most importantly about Trouba is his character- being a Michigan native, which is in the heart of Ontario Hockey League territory, he's maintained that he will remain a Michigan commit, despite the high-profile Kitchener Rangers owning his rights, and will likely continue to pursue him. In an age where the norm is hearing about players breaking their collegiate commitments to head to Major Junior, its an admirable stance- and it will be an excellent developmental environment for Trouba, where he'll play against older and stronger competition on the weekends, while having plenty of practice time to refine his skills during the week. Ultimately, I think Trouba makes a ton of sense at #7.

Nate: I have to agree with Dan that Jacob Trouba makes sense for the Wild to pick at #7 if he's around. Trouba may be the most defensive of the blue liners who are hovering around the 5-10 spots but he brings a physical style unlike anyone in the Minnesota system. It's a major reason why Chuck Fletcher took three seconds to re-sign Clayton Stoner.

At the same time, Trouba's size, ability to make the first pass and skating make him desirable with three aspects that the team has coveted since Brent Flahr took over the board. It's not a reach by any stretch of the imagination and I wouldn't be surprised to see someone take him off the board before Minnesota. Throw in the ability to let him develop in college, playing against the best 20 year-old hockey players in the world and holding his own last December and it's tough to find faults from both a player and organization standpoint. The only negatives are that Trouba doesn't have the same high-end ceiling as other prospects who could be around #7 and after 2 top-ten D blue liners in two years (Jonas Brodin) there still wouldn't be a true offensive defenseman in the system. That and he's not from Minnesota (sorry HF).

Photo courtesy of La Presse


  1. hate to say it but while he may not have as high a ceiling as other D likely to be around pick 7 he's IMO the "safest". I know, I know...
    But a physical guy who would probably at worst anchor our second pair and play max PK minutes would make life a lot easier on our goalies than it has been in quite a while. Like Brodin, he can still move the puck to this crop of forwards we'll see coming in.

  2. Trouba is my #1 pick too for who will likely be around come the #7 pick.

    Also, we may be missing a 1st/2nd round pick offensive defenseman, but Chay Genoway is still in the system and put up good numbers in Houston in his first year. He may be an option. Do you FRB guys think he has a shot as an NHLer?

    Finally, I know it won't be this year, but I almost feel like the Wild signing Nate Schmidt of the Gophers is almost a given (provided he continues to play at such a high level). Any thoughts on this?

    P.S. Love this blog!

  3. Joel-

    First and foremost, thanks for the readership.

    I do think Genoway has a good chance of being a regular NHLer. He skates so well, has hockey sense, and moves the puck effectively, which are all attractive qualities to have. There are size concerns for sure, but I think you can shelter him by putting a more physical partner with him- that being said, the best defense is not being hemmed in your end after all. His ability to get the puck up to the forwards will help his cause greatly.

    I'd imagine Nate Schmidt is on a lot of people's radars after last season, but it will be interesting to see how he progresses this season- does he build on last season, or does he rest on his laurels a bit? He seems like a driven individual who really worked hard last Summer, so one could presume he'll do the same this Summer as well.

  4. Re: Nate Schmidt-

    I also cover the Gophers so I get a chance to watch Schmidt on a regular basis. He took a giant step in his development over the last year with his skating and defense but there are still things for him to work on defensively. One of the issues his freshman year was that Schmidt was regularly out-muscled and out of position (playing more of a rover) where it affected the ability to use his offensive weapons. That wasn't the case this year and another year where he improves is sure to make NHL teams notice.

    And glad you like the blog. Thanks!

  5. Nate Schmidt has MILES to go before he can defend at the NHL level! But, he's a great skater and might very well develop into a 2nd/3rd pairing defenseman who plays on the 2nd powerplay unit. I'd be all for the Wild signing him, but I'm a huge Gopher fan, so I hope they wait until after is senior year...although I do not expect him to play at the U until then.